Welcome 
Thursday, February 23, 2012

Edition 35 (Nov 2011)

 

Edition 35 (Nov 2011)

Editor's letter: The guardians of supply

Two recent stories provide an excellent insight into life on the front line of purchasing in the present climate. Both stories involve UK retailers, but this by no means reduces their significance or relevance to other industries or regions.

In the first, Marks & Spencer asked its top-60 suppliers for a one-off financial contribution to help fund a store revamp and associated marketing campaign. In the second, suppliers to Waitrose reacted furiously to attempts by the food retailer to force through substantial price reductions.

The common theme is, of course, supplier management, but the bigger picture is the suggestion that some organisations are resorting to increasingly aggressive measures in their pursuit of lower costs. There’s nothing wrong with trying to achieve lower costs, but it’s all too easy to focus on short-term results to the detriment of longer-term value – and undermining strategic supplier relations for short-term P&L benefit certainly risks doing that.

At the Procurement Leaders Forum 2010 in Boston, a participant on one of the panel discussions expressed similar concerns, but laid the blame squarely at the door of the CFO, accusing most of being so focused on cost reduction that they ultimately weakened the balance sheet. Leaving aside the technical arguments of how reducing cost can impact the balance sheet, it’s a fascinating theory – would a CFO wantonly damage the balance sheet of their own business? No.

It brings to mind a conversation I had with a CFO who has enjoyed a long and successful career in the oil and gas sector. He says the most important characteristics of a successful CFO are integrity and strength of character – the personality to do the right thing and the strength to stand their ground in the face of intense pressure from other senior executives.

If CFOs are the guardians of their organisation’s finances, CPOs, in contrast, are the guardians of the supply base and the significant value that exists there. Damaging strategic-supplier relations can have significant implications on shareholder value in the long term and it would be ill advised for a CPO of a large public company to allow this to happen.

And this is why strategies employed by the likes of M&S and Waitrose ring alarm bells. While they might be good for short-term P&L performance, they may not be for long-term shareholder value – and that’s what CPOs must protect, regardless of what the CFO or CEO demands.

We have entered the era of paradoxes, when downturns go hand in hand with material scarcity, when equity bears battle with commodity bulls. And for corporate buyers, it's a minefield.

PROCUREMENT FEATURES

PROCUREMENT OPINIONS

CPO View: Unlikely partners Online Global Members only
A strong alliance between sales and procurement may seem unlikely, but the benefits, 
in terms of value-add and wider acceptance, mean it’s a partnership worth developing

Deverill's advocate: Continents apart Online Global Members only
There is no doubting the huge business and sourcing opportunities Africa has to offer – if you can overcome the logistical challenges, that is

Economics: Not all bad Online Global Members only
European leaders' failure to deal decisively with the euro crisis, coupled with measures to re-impose border controls, risk making the eurozone a no-go area for international trade


Untitled Document

The Procurement Leaders Network is a membership-led community where leading international procurement, sourcing and supply chain management executives engage in new ways to spearhead innovation in procurement strategy.

KEY:

a = Associate Members Only

ADVERTISEMENT


Supplier Search



Subscribe to the RSS feeds below to receive up-to-the-minute procurement news and articles right to your desktop.



NETWORK PARTNERS

Gold Partners

Silver Partners